Nice article and on Point. My question is even though many bloggers do write pertaining to three points they made here then how come their comments are not full of responses? Is that to say the they are wrong in their choices of subject is wrong or does that men they have a very small niche market that is rarely read. I believe this to be the same with artists. So in my response to this your blog should be very high in interest which I would make as a 4th point to this article and include it to the other three. Perhaps that was said and I just missed that point?...........See what I mean?.....Seems the older we get the shorter our attention gets. In that retrospect I would add a 5th Shock article writing. The boring stuff will only increase your unsubscribers .....More testing results coming soon.
Zara Altair Not sure I only saw what was written after several redirects I had to go through just to get to the excerpt to the article ( not counting all the pop ups) which are very annoying also. I wonder why I can't get away getting penalized from Google for that but most others do btw.....anyway doesn't matter I am not going to run that gauntlet again, I got the point.
Arthur Morehead Wow! Which article had the popups? Sorry about that. As to your original point, two things. Yes, it is probably a small niche market with articles used as a reference when speaking with customers. And, probably a website that is not high-ranking and does not have snippets for Google Answers. One major way to get those articles out is to share on sites such as G+ and to repurpose bits like Omi Sido does with frequency. To your "fourth point" the article will be high in interest, if original thought and quality points are directed at the target audience which is already incorporated in one of the three points. Did that help?
Nice article and on Point. My question is even though many bloggers do write pertaining to three points they made here then how come their comments are not full of responses? Is that to say the they are wrong in their choices of subject is wrong or does that men they have a very small niche market that is rarely read. I believe this to be the same with artists.
ReplyDeleteSo in my response to this your blog should be very high in interest which I would make as a 4th point to this article and include it to the other three. Perhaps that was said and I just missed that point?...........See what I mean?.....Seems the older we get the shorter our attention gets. In that retrospect I would add a 5th Shock article writing. The boring stuff will only increase your unsubscribers .....More testing results coming soon.
Arthur Morehead Great point. Are you referring to Gianluca's article? Just want to be clear. Mark Traphagan had three points as well.
ReplyDeleteZara Altair
ReplyDeleteNot sure I only saw what was written after several redirects I had to go through just to get to the excerpt to the article ( not counting all the pop ups) which are very annoying also. I wonder why I can't get away getting penalized from Google for that but most others do btw.....anyway doesn't matter I am not going to run that gauntlet again, I got the point.
Arthur Morehead Wow! Which article had the popups? Sorry about that.
ReplyDeleteAs to your original point, two things. Yes, it is probably a small niche market with articles used as a reference when speaking with customers. And, probably a website that is not high-ranking and does not have snippets for Google Answers.
One major way to get those articles out is to share on sites such as G+ and to repurpose bits like Omi Sido does with frequency.
To your "fourth point" the article will be high in interest, if original thought and quality points are directed at the target audience which is already incorporated in one of the three points.
Did that help?